Bug 915769
Summary: | coroparse: Read unitialized memory if config file contains service without name | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Jan Friesse <jfriesse> | ||||
Component: | corosync | Assignee: | Jan Friesse <jfriesse> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | ||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 6.4 | CC: | cluster-maint, jkortus, lnovich, sdake | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | All | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | corosync-1.4.1-16.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: |
Cause:
Start corosync with config file where service subsection doesn't contain name key.
Consequence:
Segfault or refuse to load service with "random garbage" name (access to unitialized memory)
Fix:
Properly check if name key exists.
Result:
Corosync will display error and exits properly.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-21 04:32:55 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jan Friesse
2013-02-26 13:30:44 UTC
Verified with config-service-without-name.sh: FAIL on corosync-1.4.1-15.el6.x86_64 (RHEL6.4) (coredump) PASS on corosync-1.4.1-17.el6.x86_64 (RHEL6.5) Sep 11 18:05:22 virt-014 corosync[4070]: [SERV ] Service section defined in config file without name key Sep 11 18:05:22 virt-014 corosync[4070]: [MAIN ] Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status 13 at main.c:1501. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1531.html |