Bug 91668

Summary:	more detailled information
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	acount closed by user <a1459440>
Component:	rhl-release-notes-x86	Assignee:	Ed Bailey <ed>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Ed Bailey <ed>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	9	CC:	barryn, mitr
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-07-23 20:46:48 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description acount closed by user 2003-05-27 00:24:00 UTC

Description of problem:

this was for rawhide, but it hasn't this package

I would like to see more dellailed information , something like the very nice
FreeBSD Release Notes: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/relnotes-i386.html
or Sun Solaris docs  http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/817-0485/6mg9i7pq8?a=view
, with technical information like max size for fs and files, max memory
supported, nÂº max of harddisk, processor, state of the large file problem(
http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/709 )...
and more info too for the hardware supported:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/hardware-i386.html . Which are the best
drivers supported ....

-thanks a 1.ooo.ooo-

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
    
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Ed Bailey 2003-07-23 20:46:48 UTC

I agree that the release notes could be better than they are.  I think we
disagree  a bit on some of the details (I think system maximums should appear in
a different document, for example), but my goal is to improve them.  It will not
be possible during this release cycle, so I am marking this one "deferred" and
closing it...

Comment 2 acount closed by user 2003-09-25 22:47:34 UTC

is there any change to get with fedora _2_ so good documentacion like FreeBSD
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/ ?

Comment 3 Ed Bailey 2003-09-25 23:03:59 UTC

No, not in the Fedora 1 test 2 timeframe.  And (to be completely honest), I
doubt you'll see much change for Fedora 1 "gold", either.  What you *will* see
(as soon as I can get some other priorities off my plate) is the start of a
conversation on fedora-docs-list as to what should be in the release notes. 
Feel free to join in... :-)