Bug 91668 - more detailled information
Summary: more detailled information
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: rhl-release-notes-x86   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 9
Hardware: All Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ed Bailey
QA Contact: Ed Bailey
Keywords: FutureFeature
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2003-05-27 00:24 UTC by acount closed by user
Modified: 2007-03-27 04:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2003-07-23 20:46:48 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description acount closed by user 2003-05-27 00:24:00 UTC
Description of problem:

this was for rawhide, but it hasn't this package

I would like to see more dellailed information , something like the very nice
FreeBSD Release Notes: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/relnotes-i386.html
or Sun Solaris docs  http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/817-0485/6mg9i7pq8?a=view
, with technical information like max size for fs and files, max memory
supported, nº max of harddisk, processor, state of the large file problem(
http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/709 )...
and more info too for the hardware supported:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/hardware-i386.html . Which are the best
drivers supported ....

-thanks a 1.ooo.ooo-

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Comment 1 Ed Bailey 2003-07-23 20:46:48 UTC
I agree that the release notes could be better than they are.  I think we
disagree  a bit on some of the details (I think system maximums should appear in
a different document, for example), but my goal is to improve them.  It will not
be possible during this release cycle, so I am marking this one "deferred" and
closing it...

Comment 2 acount closed by user 2003-09-25 22:47:34 UTC
is there any change to get with fedora _2_ so good documentacion like FreeBSD
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/ ?

Comment 3 Ed Bailey 2003-09-25 23:03:59 UTC
No, not in the Fedora 1 test 2 timeframe.  And (to be completely honest), I
doubt you'll see much change for Fedora 1 "gold", either.  What you *will* see
(as soon as I can get some other priorities off my plate) is the start of a
conversation on fedora-docs-list as to what should be in the release notes. 
Feel free to join in... :-)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.