Bug 917656

Summary:	License field in openshift-java-client POM confusing
Product:	OKD	Reporter:	Tomas 'Sheldon' Radej <tradej>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Bilhar <baulakh>
Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM	QA Contact:	ecs-bugs
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	2.x	CC:	fedora, mmccomas
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-03-18 19:26:08 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	902017

Description Tomas 'Sheldon' Radej 2013-03-04 13:17:57 UTC

The openshift-java-client's POM file claims that the project's license is ASL 2.0, but great majority of the files are in fact bearing the EPL reference, and so is the license file itself (./license). I find the current situation confusing, or even misleading. Please, either fix the POM license field or relicense the project under ASL 2.0, if possible.

Thank you.

P. S. This issue is blocking the openshift-java-client's inclusion in Fedora.

Comment 3 Tomas 'Sheldon' Radej 2013-03-18 13:49:41 UTC

Making this bug public (was private by mistake).

Comment 4 Gerard Ryan 2013-03-18 16:41:02 UTC

I've submitted a pull request at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-java-client/pull/31

I think that should solve it, once merged, right?

Comment 5 Tomas 'Sheldon' Radej 2013-03-18 17:50:51 UTC

Indeed. Thank you.

Comment 6 Gerard Ryan 2013-03-18 19:26:08 UTC

Wow. that was a quick merge! Thanks to André Dietisheim! :)