The openshift-java-client's POM file claims that the project's license is ASL 2.0, but great majority of the files are in fact bearing the EPL reference, and so is the license file itself (./license). I find the current situation confusing, or even misleading. Please, either fix the POM license field or relicense the project under ASL 2.0, if possible.
P. S. This issue is blocking the openshift-java-client's inclusion in Fedora.
Making this bug public (was private by mistake).
I've submitted a pull request at https://github.com/openshift/openshift-java-client/pull/31
I think that should solve it, once merged, right?
Indeed. Thank you.
Wow. that was a quick merge! Thanks to André Dietisheim! :)