Bug 921294
| Summary: | dnf downgrade failure | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rahul Sundaram <metherid> |
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Ales Kozumplik <akozumpl> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | akozumpl, jzeleny |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | dnf-0.3.1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-03-22 13:52:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Rahul Sundaram
2013-03-13 22:37:46 UTC
Addressed by 0572123, the fix will be included in dnf-0.3.1. This will only make F19 and beyond DNF versions. Considering, dnf is experimental at this point, wouldn't you want to push the latest version to all branches to maximize exposure and feedback? I can pull in the F19 version to confirming the fix but it would be better if you didn't have a F18 specific branch IMO (In reply to comment #2) > Considering, dnf is experimental at this point, wouldn't you want to push > the latest version to all branches to maximize exposure and feedback? I can > pull in the F19 version to confirming the fix but it would be better if you > didn't have a F18 specific branch IMO I was giving this a lot of thought but ultimately, because of the big move to librepo in F19 versions and despite the experimental state of DNF, people on F18 could be very confused by possible new tracebacks and unexpected behaviors. |