Bug 927158

Summary: Rebase to nss-softokn 3.14.3 to fix the lucky-13 issue [6.4.z]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Libor Miksik <lmiksik>
Component: nss-softoknAssignee: Elio Maldonado Batiz <emaldona>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Aleš Mareček <amarecek>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.5CC: amarecek, emaldona, eparis, hkario, kengert, ksrot, pm-eus, rrelyea, sforsber, thoger
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Rebase, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: nss-softokn-3.14.3-3.el6_4 Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-07 17:50:52 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 919172    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Keeps the crypto code on rhel-5 and rhel-6 the same rrelyea: review+

Description Libor Miksik 2013-03-25 09:04:31 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #919172 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.4 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 7 Elio Maldonado Batiz 2013-04-24 17:15:26 UTC 
Created attachment 739549 [details]
Keeps the crypto code on rhel-5 and rhel-6 the same

Bob, this is the same patch applied for rhel-5.9.z/-5.10 that you reviewed earlier that we need on rhel-6.4.z/rhel-6.5 to keep the code within the cryptographic boundary the same. Important for rhel-6.5/5.10 but needs to be applied on the z-streams as well.
Comment 8 Bob Relyea 2013-04-26 17:59:22 UTC 
Comment on attachment 739549 [details]
Keeps the crypto code on rhel-5 and rhel-6 the same

r+ rrelyea
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-08-07 17:50:52 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1144.html