Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 919172 - Rebase to nss-softokn 3.14.3 to fix the lucky-13 issue [6.5]
Rebase to nss-softokn 3.14.3 to fix the lucky-13 issue [6.5]
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: nss-softokn (Show other bugs)
6.5
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Elio Maldonado Batiz
Hubert Kario
: Rebase, ZStream
: 821440 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 919174 919180
Blocks: 918950 927158
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-03-07 13:53 EST by Elio Maldonado Batiz
Modified: 2013-11-21 01:11 EST (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: nss-softokn-3.14.3-1.el6
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
This advisory rebases the nss-softokn package 3.14.3 to address CVE-2013-1620 - Non-constant time CBC decoding results in padding oracle, aka Lucky Thirteen attack. Bug 822365
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 01:11:58 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1558 normal SHIPPED_LIVE nss and nspr bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 19:40:48 EST

  None (edit)
Description Elio Maldonado Batiz 2013-03-07 13:53:05 EST
Description of problem: Bug 918950 - [RFE][RHEL6] was entered to rebase to nss-3.14.3 to fix the lucky-13 issue. Since the fix encompases changes to the softoken/freebl code so we also need to rebase nss-softokn to the same version as nss.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 4 Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2013-03-22 13:46:34 EDT
I guess this bug needs the blocker flag, because I see it in bug 919174 and bug 918950 ?
Comment 7 Eric Paris 2013-08-07 14:53:20 EDT
*** Bug 821440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 01:11:58 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1558.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.