Bug 927241

Summary: [abrt] gnome-photos-3.7.3-6.fc19: photos_organize_collection_model_destroy: Process /usr/bin/gnome-photos was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Matthew Javelet <matthew.javelet>
Component: gnome-photosAssignee: Mathieu Bridon <bochecha>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 19CC: bochecha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:d92c1c9ee654254aa87f647d5a92c0a0063c33cb
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-25 14:44:19 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status
none
File: var_log_messages none

Description Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:35 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
gnome-photos-3.7.3-6.fc19

Additional info:
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        gnome-photos
crash_function: photos_organize_collection_model_destroy
executable:     /usr/bin/gnome-photos
kernel:         3.6.10-4.fc18.x86_64
uid:            1000
ureports_counter: 1
xsession_errors: 

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #0 photos_organize_collection_model_destroy at photos-organize-collection-model.c:155
 #5 gtk_widget_dispose at gtkwidget.c:10771
 #7 gtk_scrolled_window_forall at gtkscrolledwindow.c:1582
 #8 gtk_container_destroy at gtkcontainer.c:1377
 #13 gtk_widget_dispose at gtkwidget.c:10771
 #15 gtk_box_forall at gtkbox.c:1865
 #16 gtk_container_destroy at gtkcontainer.c:1377
 #21 gtk_widget_dispose at gtkwidget.c:10771
 #23 gtk_container_destroy at gtkcontainer.c:1377
 #28 gtk_widget_dispose at gtkwidget.c:10771

Comment 1 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:37 UTC
Created attachment 716014 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:39 UTC
Created attachment 716015 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:41 UTC
Created attachment 716016 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:43 UTC
Created attachment 716017 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:46 UTC
Created attachment 716018 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:49 UTC
Created attachment 716019 [details]
File: limits

Comment 7 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:52 UTC
Created attachment 716020 [details]
File: maps

Comment 8 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:54 UTC
Created attachment 716021 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 9 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:57 UTC
Created attachment 716022 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 10 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 13:31:59 UTC
Created attachment 716023 [details]
File: var_log_messages

Comment 11 Mathieu Bridon 2013-03-25 14:32:36 UTC
Thanks for the bug report Matthew.

Looking at it, it seems like you tried the « Organize » function?

If so, then this bug would be a duplicate of bug 924285.

Comment 12 Matthew Javelet 2013-03-25 14:39:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #11)
> Thanks for the bug report Matthew.
> 
> Looking at it, it seems like you tried the « Organize » function?
> 
> If so, then this bug would be a duplicate of bug 924285.

Which it is. When the automatic bug reporting tool says that the bug has not been reported to bugzilla then I do so. 

Sorry for the dupe. Hopefully all my extra information will help though.

Comment 13 Mathieu Bridon 2013-03-25 14:44:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Thanks for the bug report Matthew.
> > 
> > Looking at it, it seems like you tried the « Organize » function?
> > 
> > If so, then this bug would be a duplicate of bug 924285.
> 
> Which it is. When the automatic bug reporting tool says that the bug has not
> been reported to bugzilla then I do so. 

Yeah, ABRT is only capable of identifying duplicates with bugs it opened itself. :(

> Sorry for the dupe.

Never be sorry for going through the trouble of opening abug report. On the contrary, please keep them coming. :)

> Hopefully all my extra information will help though.

In this very specific case, no. The application crashes not because of a bug, but because the feature hasn't been implemented at all, yet. ;)

Anyway, closing as duplicate, you can follow the discussion on the other bug.

Thanks!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 924285 ***