Version-Release number of selected component: gnome-photos-3.7.3-6.fc19 Additional info: backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: gnome-photos crash_function: photos_organize_collection_model_destroy executable: /usr/bin/gnome-photos kernel: 3.6.10-4.fc18.x86_64 uid: 1000 ureports_counter: 1 xsession_errors: Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 photos_organize_collection_model_destroy at photos-organize-collection-model.c:155 #5 gtk_widget_dispose at gtkwidget.c:10771 #7 gtk_scrolled_window_forall at gtkscrolledwindow.c:1582 #8 gtk_container_destroy at gtkcontainer.c:1377 #13 gtk_widget_dispose at gtkwidget.c:10771 #15 gtk_box_forall at gtkbox.c:1865 #16 gtk_container_destroy at gtkcontainer.c:1377 #21 gtk_widget_dispose at gtkwidget.c:10771 #23 gtk_container_destroy at gtkcontainer.c:1377 #28 gtk_widget_dispose at gtkwidget.c:10771
Created attachment 716014 [details] File: backtrace
Created attachment 716015 [details] File: cgroup
Created attachment 716016 [details] File: core_backtrace
Created attachment 716017 [details] File: dso_list
Created attachment 716018 [details] File: environ
Created attachment 716019 [details] File: limits
Created attachment 716020 [details] File: maps
Created attachment 716021 [details] File: open_fds
Created attachment 716022 [details] File: proc_pid_status
Created attachment 716023 [details] File: var_log_messages
Thanks for the bug report Matthew. Looking at it, it seems like you tried the « Organize » function? If so, then this bug would be a duplicate of bug 924285.
(In reply to comment #11) > Thanks for the bug report Matthew. > > Looking at it, it seems like you tried the « Organize » function? > > If so, then this bug would be a duplicate of bug 924285. Which it is. When the automatic bug reporting tool says that the bug has not been reported to bugzilla then I do so. Sorry for the dupe. Hopefully all my extra information will help though.
(In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Thanks for the bug report Matthew. > > > > Looking at it, it seems like you tried the « Organize » function? > > > > If so, then this bug would be a duplicate of bug 924285. > > Which it is. When the automatic bug reporting tool says that the bug has not > been reported to bugzilla then I do so. Yeah, ABRT is only capable of identifying duplicates with bugs it opened itself. :( > Sorry for the dupe. Never be sorry for going through the trouble of opening abug report. On the contrary, please keep them coming. :) > Hopefully all my extra information will help though. In this very specific case, no. The application crashes not because of a bug, but because the feature hasn't been implemented at all, yet. ;) Anyway, closing as duplicate, you can follow the discussion on the other bug. Thanks! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 924285 ***