Bug 927967

Summary:	initial-setup is not included in default install
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Martin Sivák <msivak>
Component:	comps	Assignee:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	19	CC:	awilliam, dennis, robatino, rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	AcceptedBlocker
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-04-03 01:36:44 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	834084

Description Martin Sivák 2013-03-26 15:07:08 UTC

Description of problem:

The package initial-setup is not included in the default installation. It should be mandatory for all groups except minimal in the same way firstboot is.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

F19 Alpha TC2

Additional info:

initial-setup-0.3.1-1.fc19 is present on the TC2 DVD but misses one dependency in it's spec file (python-di)

initial-setup-0.3.2-1.fc19 is the current version for F19 with the dependency issue fixed

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2013-03-26 15:46:18 UTC

Fixed in comps.

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2013-03-26 17:28:01 UTC

msivak: should we also take firstboot out?

Comment 3 Martin Sivák 2013-03-26 17:34:05 UTC

It is not necessary. I have already disabled all the screens in it. We might remove it from Fedora unless there are 3rd party plugins we would like to keep available... do any spins use their own firstboot screens?

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2013-03-27 16:50:19 UTC

msivak: "It is not necessary" - well, it'll still confuse people if it's present; it would be clearer to take it out. Good question about spins, though. I don't think any use custom firstboot stuff, but we can check.

Comment 5 Kamil Páral 2013-03-27 16:54:20 UTC

We should remove firstboot from comps, because it serves no further purpose; it just makes the ISO bigger and introduces more paths in which something can go wrong.

If any spin requires firstboot, they can adjust their kickstart.

Comment 6 Adam Williamson 2013-03-27 16:55:58 UTC

Discussed at 2013-03-27 blocker review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-03-27/f19alpha-blocker-review-3.2013-03-27-16.01.log.txt . Accepted as a blocker per criterion https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Expected_installed_system_boot_behavior : "A system installed with a graphical package set must boot to the 'firstboot' utility on the first boot after installation. The firstboot utility must be able to create a working user account." (note intent of criterion is to cover a 'firstboot-type utility', wording is currently being revised). It appears this fix didn't make TC2, but should make TC3.

kparal: good point.

Comment 7 Jens Petersen 2013-04-03 00:53:05 UTC

I think this is fixed as of TC3.

Comment 8 Adam Williamson 2013-04-03 01:36:44 UTC

Yes, it was fixed in commit ddf61ab5d28d128f85696c3422fcbdaaad8c135d, Tue Mar 26 11:46:01 2013 . Closing. But note https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929403 .