Bug 929044

Summary:	Ardour version 3 package request
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Vitaly <jauthu>
Component:	distribution	Assignee:	Nils Philippsen <nphilipp>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	18	CC:	calamandrei, dennis, hdegoede, nphilipp, oget.fedora, roeplay, rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ardour3-3.5.74-2.fc19	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-11-19 21:48:55 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1007099
Bug Blocks:

Description Vitaly 2013-03-29 06:14:07 UTC

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0
Build Identifier: 

Ardour 3 is already released and there is no package for it. I created one.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11906328/fedora_pkgs/ardour3.spec spec-file
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11906328/fedora_pkgs/ardour3-3.0-1.x86_64.rpm built x86_64 rpm for Fedora 18
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11906328/fedora_pkgs/ardour-3.0.tar.bz2 sources (not that easy to get from ardour's site)

Is there a way to get it into repositories? It is my very first package and I do not plan to become a contributor (for now) so the best (for me) is if someone can take care of that spec/rpm and get it into repositories.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Orcan Ogetbil 2013-03-30 03:32:02 UTC

Thanks, we are working on it. It will most likely be a separate package. Nils, any recent updates?

Comment 2 Nils Philippsen 2013-09-10 12:54:15 UTC

I'll take this. I plan to merge the various spec files with the one I have and submit a package review request shortly.

Comment 3 Nils Philippsen 2013-09-10 13:21:13 UTC

As the result of this is a new source package, changing component to "distribution".

Comment 4 Nils Philippsen 2013-09-10 13:22:07 UTC

*** Bug 981079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Nils Philippsen 2013-09-11 22:25:19 UTC

I've opened the package review request in bug #1007099, just in case anyone wants to pick this up :).

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-11-04 22:15:39 UTC

ardour3-3.5.14-1.fc20, libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20094/ardour3-3.5.14-1.fc20,libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2013-11-05 09:40:16 UTC

ardour3-3.5.14-1.fc19, libltc-1.1.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20198/ardour3-3.5.14-1.fc19,libltc-1.1.2-1.fc19

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-11-05 09:40:30 UTC

ardour3-3.5.14-1.fc18, libltc-1.1.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20148/ardour3-3.5.14-1.fc18,libltc-1.1.2-1.fc18

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2013-11-05 19:59:10 UTC

ardour3-3.5.14-1.fc20, libltc-1.1.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2013-11-19 21:48:55 UTC

ardour3-3.5.74-2.fc20, libltc-1.1.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.

Comment 11 Andrew Ter-Grigoryan 2013-11-19 23:08:01 UTC

Is there any reason to be maintaining the old Ardour 2 alongside the currently developed Ardour3? I can't think of why someone wouldn't switch.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2013-11-21 04:34:18 UTC

ardour3-3.5.74-2.fc18, libltc-1.1.3-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2013-11-21 04:41:47 UTC

ardour3-3.5.74-2.fc19, libltc-1.1.3-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

Comment 14 Nils Philippsen 2013-11-21 16:30:02 UTC

(In reply to Andrew Ter-Grigoryan from comment #11)
> Is there any reason to be maintaining the old Ardour 2 alongside the
> currently developed Ardour3? I can't think of why someone wouldn't switch.

Here's the reasoning I put in the review bug #1007099:

"NB: this is version 3.x of the existing ardour package and supposed to be installable in parallel. We'll keep the old version around because while the new version can open ardour 2.x projects, some information may be lost during import and people should be able to edit their old projects without running afoul of this. Users should use the current version 3.x for new projects."