Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Please update libeina to 1.7.6|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Dan Mashal <dan.mashal>|
|Component:||libeina||Assignee:||Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||dan.mashal, i, metherid, notting, package-review, tcallawa, terjeros|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2013-04-19 17:51:50 EDT||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Dan Mashal 2013-04-18 05:38:41 EDT
Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eina.spec SRPM URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/eina-1.7.6-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Core development libraries for Enlightenment Successful f18 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5270317 Successful f20 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5270314
Comment 1 Christopher Meng 2013-04-18 06:33:07 EDT
I've noticed that a orphaned package has the same name. See https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/eina
Comment 2 Dan Mashal 2013-04-18 07:16:12 EDT
Worry about that when we get there I guess. Waiting on Rahul.
Comment 3 Rahul Sundaram 2013-04-18 23:58:25 EDT
Sure. Go ahead. You don't need my permission.
Comment 4 Dan Mashal 2013-04-18 23:59:21 EDT
Okay, I've got ecore pretty much built as well. Would you like to review this?
Comment 5 Rahul Sundaram 2013-04-19 00:04:38 EDT
I think in this case, you are merely duplicating an existing package called libeina in the repo. So you should close this.
Comment 6 Dan Mashal 2013-04-19 01:11:42 EDT
That package is not updated to 1.7.6 and owned by spot. I would assume "libeina" is the proper name for it since spot packaged it though. Looping him in for his thoughts but yeah I see what you are saying. Will leave this open until spot comments.
Comment 7 Tom "spot" Callaway 2013-04-19 10:13:34 EDT
Do we need 1.7.6 in any targets other than f19/f20?
Comment 8 Rahul Sundaram 2013-04-19 13:23:31 EDT
No. 19/20 is fine. Thanks
Comment 9 Dan Mashal 2013-04-19 16:57:47 EDT
Comment 10 Rahul Sundaram 2013-04-19 17:51:50 EDT
This is already done by now.