Bug 959691
| Summary: | /usr/libexec/postfix/chroot-update show a failure by default in systemd output | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael S. <misc> |
| Component: | postfix | Assignee: | Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | cfergeau, jskarvad |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-05-22 07:50:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Looks like a duplicate of bug #917463 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 917463 *** |
Running systemctl status postfix show a error message with default configuration : [root@liliana misc]# systemctl status postfix postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Agent Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/postfix.service; enabled) Active: active (running) since sam. 2013-05-04 22:00:16 CEST; 24min ago Process: 31091 ExecStop=/usr/sbin/postfix stop (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 31107 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/postfix start (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 31104 ExecStartPre=/usr/libexec/postfix/chroot-update (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Process: 31101 ExecStartPre=/usr/libexec/postfix/aliasesdb (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 31179 (master) CGroup: name=systemd:/system/postfix.service ├─31179 /usr/libexec/postfix/master -w ├─31180 pickup -l -t unix -u └─31181 qmgr -l -t unix -u While everything is working fine, it would be cleaner to not fail, as this could make sysadmin wonder if something wrong is going on. ( but adding "exit 0" would then hide errors, so that's not good either )