Bug 960870

Summary: RFE: Include numatop in numactl package
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johannbg>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 18CC: anton, notting, package-review, pholasek
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-12 09:12:45 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
SRPM for numatop in it's own package
none
SRPM for numatop in it's own package none

Description Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2013-05-08 08:24:49 UTC 
Description of problem:

Yao Jin @ Intel released not so long ago numatop 

Now it's a question if we should included it in the numactl package or it's own separated package never the less let's get it into Fedora so "Shak" and the rest of RHEL performance team have some new tool to talk about at the summit ;)

https://01.org/numatop
https://github.com/01org/numatop

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2013-05-08 10:41:52 UTC 
Created attachment 745200 [details]
SRPM for numatop in it's own package
Comment 2 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2013-05-08 10:49:56 UTC 
Note that I have still yet to hear from Yao with regards to license on this ( unless Intel open source technology center has an default license for all the code there ). 

I just threw in GPLv2 to successfully build the package
Comment 3 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2013-05-08 12:46:45 UTC 
Created attachment 745228 [details]
SRPM for numatop in it's own package

Now with correct licensing
Comment 4 Anton Arapov 2013-05-12 08:07:53 UTC 
Johann, in case you want a new package in Fedora you have to follow the process described there: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

I don't think it is a good idea to merge two upstream projects into one Fedora package. The merge should be done in upstream first.

Anton
Comment 5 Pierre-YvesChibon 2013-05-12 09:05:14 UTC 
Re-assigning to the right component