Bug 960870 - RFE: Include numatop in numactl package
Summary: RFE: Include numatop in numactl package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: 18
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-08 08:24 UTC by Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
Modified: 2013-05-12 09:12 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-12 09:12:45 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
SRPM for numatop in it's own package (65.79 KB, application/x-rpm)
2013-05-08 10:41 UTC, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
no flags Details
SRPM for numatop in it's own package (65.80 KB, application/x-rpm)
2013-05-08 12:46 UTC, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
no flags Details

Description Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2013-05-08 08:24:49 UTC
Description of problem:

Yao Jin @ Intel released not so long ago numatop 

Now it's a question if we should included it in the numactl package or it's own separated package never the less let's get it into Fedora so "Shak" and the rest of RHEL performance team have some new tool to talk about at the summit ;)

https://01.org/numatop
https://github.com/01org/numatop

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2013-05-08 10:41:52 UTC
Created attachment 745200 [details]
SRPM for numatop in it's own package

Comment 2 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2013-05-08 10:49:56 UTC
Note that I have still yet to hear from Yao with regards to license on this ( unless Intel open source technology center has an default license for all the code there ). 

I just threw in GPLv2 to successfully build the package

Comment 3 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2013-05-08 12:46:45 UTC
Created attachment 745228 [details]
SRPM for numatop in it's own package

Now with correct licensing

Comment 4 Anton Arapov 2013-05-12 08:07:53 UTC
Johann, in case you want a new package in Fedora you have to follow the process described there: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

I don't think it is a good idea to merge two upstream projects into one Fedora package. The merge should be done in upstream first.

Anton

Comment 5 Pierre-YvesChibon 2013-05-12 09:05:14 UTC
Re-assigning to the right component


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.