Bug 961384

Summary: Review Request: vim-javabrowser - JavaBrowser plugin for VIM
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Petr Hracek <phracek>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Robert Kuska <rkuska>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jberan, notting, package-review, rkuska, sochotni
Target Milestone: ---Flags: rkuska: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc19 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-07-15 14:41:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Petr Hracek 2013-05-09 14:05:53 UTC
Spec URL: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/vim-javabrowser/vim-javabrowser.spec
SRPM URL: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/vim-javabrowser/vim-javabrowser-2.03-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: This script is SPECIFICALLY tailored for Java language. So, it shows structure of the Java file starting with classes defined within it and NOT in a general tag structure. I found it useful and hope you all find it useful too. It also has a nice syntax to show the class members in UML format.
Fedora Account System Username: phracek

$ rpmlint vim-javabrowser.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint /home/phracek/rpmbuild/SRPMS/vim-javabrowser-2.03-1.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$

Comment 1 Stanislav Ochotnicky 2013-06-03 08:09:39 UTC
Not doing a full review, just a few comments:
 * missing description
 * Group tag is not really used/needed anymore
 * Why do you need Requires(post[un]): vim? There are no post[un] scriptlets
 * %defattr macro is not needed either

Comment 3 Robert Kuska 2013-06-27 10:02:28 UTC
I'll take this for a review.

Comment 4 Robert Kuska 2013-06-27 10:15:36 UTC
You forgot to remove %defattr macro.

Comment 5 Petr Hracek 2013-06-27 11:15:38 UTC
Thanks,

%defattr macro was removed:
Spec URL: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/vim-javabrowser/vim-javabrowser.spec
SRPM URL: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/vim-javabrowser/vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc18.src.rpm

~/work/JavaBrowser> rpmlint /home/phracek/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc19.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
~/work/JavaBrowser> rpmlint /home/phracek/rpmbuild/SRPMS/vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc19.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
~/work/JavaBrowser>

Comment 6 Robert Kuska 2013-06-27 11:25:28 UTC
The requested URL /vim-javabrowser/vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc18.src.rpm was not found on this server. Please fix that so I can use fedora-review tool.

Comment 7 Petr Hracek 2013-06-27 11:35:25 UTC
I upgraded OS to Fedora 19.

Correct URLs are:
Spec URL: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/vim-javabrowser/vim-javabrowser.spec
SRPM URL: http://phracek.fedorapeople.org/vim-javabrowser/vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc19.src.rpm

Copy paste error:(

Comment 8 Robert Kuska 2013-07-02 06:23:27 UTC
Looks good now, approved.

Comment 9 Petr Hracek 2013-07-15 11:15:48 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: vim-javabrowser
Short Description: JavaBrowser plugin for VIM
Owners: phracek
Branches: f19

Comment 10 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-07-15 12:40:05 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 11 Petr Hracek 2013-07-15 14:41:14 UTC
scm-commit (https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130715/1056572.html) -> CLOSED RAWHIDE

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2013-07-15 14:42:48 UTC
vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc19

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2013-08-10 12:38:45 UTC
vim-javabrowser-2.03-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.