Bug 962088
Summary: | fence_sanlock (2.6-2.el6) agent script incompatible with pacemaker 1.1.8-7.el6 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | John McCabe <john> |
Component: | sanlock | Assignee: | David Teigland <teigland> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | yeylon <yeylon> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | abeekhof, andreas, cluster-maint, coughlan, jpokorny, srevivo, teigland |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | 7.1 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-04-13 16:17:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
John McCabe
2013-05-11 17:02:03 UTC
Adding Andrew to cc list as requested There are at least two deviations from: https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/FenceAgentAPI - agents need to support the monitor action - targets are to be specified with either port or nodename I've moved this to RHEL7; RHEL6 is tech preview and if it is moved to supported it would be with some very limited validated usages, which would not include pacemaker. Broader support would have to be considered for RHEL7. fence_sanlock is a bit peculiar, it isn't quite like other simplistic fence agents; I'm not sure how all the details would work in a pacemaker environment. We may have to add some new restrictions/checks/caveats/etc. As far as "monitor" goes, it's one of those things that may not make sense here. As far as the agent args, I believe the agent currently specifies that in its "metadata" output. Either its a fencing agent or its not. If it is, then it needs to conform to the published API. Not planning any more work on fence_sanlock. David, in that case, please consider dropping fence-sanlock subpackage from distribution as no package is better than not well-integrated one. (or at least, making it not discovered by pacemaker) I suspect dropping a package is not so simple, but I'll try and see what happens. |