Bug 962255

Summary: Squid linked openssl, Its license problem.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: mejiko <private>
Component: squidAssignee: Michal Luscon <mluscon>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 18CC: henrik, jonathansteffan, mluscon, thozza
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-13 02:49:28 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 182235    

Description mejiko 2013-05-13 01:51:19 UTC
Hello.

Squid licensed under GPL, but linked openssl.
OpenSSL license is incompatible GPL. 

Its non-free, because license problem.


Suggests:


1. Remove openssl support and rebuild. (Its simple)

2. replace GPL compatible library (Example: nss, gnutls, etc...) but Im not tested.

Note: GNUTLS is licensed under LGPL, nss is licensed under MPL version 2.0.

3. Contact Upstream author.

4. Remove Fedora repos.


Thanks.


Reference:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#What.27s_the_deal_with_the_OpenSSL_license.3F

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpenSSL

http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2741

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=251988

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348261

Comment 1 mejiko 2013-05-13 01:51:57 UTC
Blocking FE-Legal, this is license problem.

Comment 3 Henrik Nordström 2013-05-13 02:49:28 UTC
It is not seen as a license problem for Fedora where OpenSSL is considered as a system library. See the same Fedora Licensing FAQ link you posted.

There is however a policy decision to use a common TLS framework (NSS) and there is a existing bug report for that as you already found.

Feel free to reopen to continue discussion if you disagree with my understanding of Fedora Licensing requirements.