Bug 966531
| Summary: | Review Request: perl-App-grindperl - Command-line tool to help build and test blead perl | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Petr Pisar <ppisar> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jplesnik, notting, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | jplesnik:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-06-19 12:39:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Petr Pisar
2013-05-23 12:32:05 UTC
The latest version of App-grindperl is 0.002. Please update it. Yes, master. Updated package can be found there: Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-App-grindperl/perl-App-grindperl.spec SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-App-grindperl/perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20.src.rpm Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Uses parallel make.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
$ rpmlint ./perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20.* ./perl-App-grindperl.spec
perl-App-grindperl.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) blead -> bled, bead, lead
perl-App-grindperl.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) blead -> bled, bead, lead
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint ok.
Requires
--------
$ rpm -qp --requires perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
1 /usr/bin/perl
1 git
1 make
1 perl >= 1:5.10.0
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
1 perl(App::grindperl)
1 perl(Carp)
1 perl(File::Copy)
1 perl(File::HomeDir) >= 0.98
1 perl(File::Spec)
1 perl(Getopt::Lucid)
1 perl(Path::Class)
1 perl(autodie)
1 perl(namespace::autoclean)
1 perl(strict)
1 perl(warnings)
1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Binary requires ok.
Provides
--------
$ rpm -qp --provides perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
1 perl(App::grindperl) = 0.002
1 perl-App-grindperl = 0.002-1.fc20
Binary provides ok.
Source checksums
----------------
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN/App-grindperl-0.001.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : f12fc0fb9dbea17fabb5884f83033edc369053dee211d01b605e980c07b52b8d
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f12fc0fb9dbea17fabb5884f83033edc369053dee211d01b605e980c07b52b8d
Ok
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (93e63af) last change: 2012-11-30
Package is good.
Approved.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: perl-App-grindperl Short Description: Command-line tool to help build and test blead perl Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). Thank you for the review and the repository. |