Bug 966531 - Review Request: perl-App-grindperl - Command-line tool to help build and test blead perl
Summary: Review Request: perl-App-grindperl - Command-line tool to help build and test...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jitka Plesnikova
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-23 12:32 UTC by Petr Pisar
Modified: 2013-06-19 12:39 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-19 12:39:52 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
jplesnik: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Petr Pisar 2013-05-23 12:32:05 UTC
Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-App-grindperl/perl-App-grindperl.spec
SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-App-grindperl/perl-App-grindperl-0.001-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:Hacking on the Perl source tree requires one to regularly build and test. The
grindperl tool helps automate some common configuration, build and test tasks.

Fedora Account System Username: ppisar

Comment 1 Jitka Plesnikova 2013-06-18 14:12:09 UTC
The latest version of App-grindperl is 0.002. Please update it.

Comment 3 Jitka Plesnikova 2013-06-18 15:54:44 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Uses parallel make.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
$ rpmlint ./perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20.* ./perl-App-grindperl.spec
perl-App-grindperl.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) blead -> bled, bead, lead
perl-App-grindperl.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) blead -> bled, bead, lead
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Rpmlint ok.

Requires
--------
$ rpm -qp --requires perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
      1 /usr/bin/perl
      1 git
      1 make
      1 perl >= 1:5.10.0
      1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
      1 perl(App::grindperl)
      1 perl(Carp)
      1 perl(File::Copy)
      1 perl(File::HomeDir) >= 0.98
      1 perl(File::Spec)
      1 perl(Getopt::Lucid)
      1 perl(Path::Class)
      1 perl(autodie)
      1 perl(namespace::autoclean)
      1 perl(strict)
      1 perl(warnings)
      1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
      1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Binary requires ok.

Provides
--------
$ rpm -qp --provides perl-App-grindperl-0.002-1.fc20.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c
      1 perl(App::grindperl) = 0.002
      1 perl-App-grindperl = 0.002-1.fc20
Binary provides ok.

Source checksums
----------------
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN/App-grindperl-0.001.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : f12fc0fb9dbea17fabb5884f83033edc369053dee211d01b605e980c07b52b8d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f12fc0fb9dbea17fabb5884f83033edc369053dee211d01b605e980c07b52b8d
Ok

Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (93e63af) last change: 2012-11-30


Package is good.
Approved.

Comment 4 Petr Pisar 2013-06-19 06:07:55 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-App-grindperl
Short Description: Command-line tool to help build and test blead perl
Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata
Branches: 
InitialCC: perl-sig

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-06-19 12:11:45 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 6 Petr Pisar 2013-06-19 12:39:52 UTC
Thank you for the review and the repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.