Bug 967417
Summary: | bacula included non-free code | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | mejiko <private> |
Component: | bacula | Assignee: | Petr Hracek <phracek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 18 | CC: | andreas, fschwarz, gwync, lnykryn, negativo17, phracek, tcallawa, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | bacula-5.2.13-11.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-06-04 17:46:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 182235 |
Description
mejiko
2013-05-27 04:53:28 UTC
Blocking FE-Legal, This is license problem. Debian patch which removes sha1 from the sources: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=blob_plain;f=debian/patches/switch-nonfree-sha1-to-openssl.patch;hb=6c562cfdaffd730c796518233f0d97da08a3891b This will prevent building Bacula without OpenSSL support but with SHA1 enabled. This is not our case since in Fedora it was always shipped linked to OpenSSL; so I think the fix is pretty simple. Regards, --Simone I have just another question. In bacula package are also md5.c and md5.h files. They should be also modified and removed, right? sha1 files were removed. Makefile.in file was modified accordingly. scm-commit (http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130527/1028300.html) -> MODIFIED In build log can be seen that sha1.c file is not build up anymore. OpenSSL is enabled by default. bacula-5.2.13-11.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.2.13-11.fc19 bacula-5.2.13-11.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.2.13-11.fc18 Petr, the md5 source code is fine to keep. bacula-5.2.13-11.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.2.13-11.fc17 Package bacula-5.2.13-11.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing bacula-5.2.13-11.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-9468/bacula-5.2.13-11.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). bacula-5.2.13-11.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. bacula-5.2.13-11.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. bacula-5.2.13-11.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |