Bug 969032
Summary: | IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alexey Derlaft <derlafff> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Component: | babel | Assignee: | Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Version: | 19 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, awilliam, derlafff, dshea, fschwarz, g.kaviyarasu, ignatenko, jeff, jonathan, mkolman, nphilipp, robatino, sbueno, vanmeeuwen+fedora | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:493c23b6b9307a91369394286915978607eb102e5100ebb648b61191470e20a3 RejectedBlocker | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2013-10-02 18:43:55 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Alexey Derlaft
2013-05-30 14:05:11 UTC
Created attachment 754872 [details]
File: anaconda-tb
Created attachment 754873 [details]
File: anaconda.log
Created attachment 754874 [details]
File: backtrace
Created attachment 754875 [details]
File: environ
Created attachment 754876 [details]
File: ifcfg.log
Created attachment 754877 [details]
File: lsblk_output
Created attachment 754878 [details]
File: nmcli_dev_list
Created attachment 754879 [details]
File: packaging.log
Created attachment 754880 [details]
File: program.log
Created attachment 754881 [details]
File: storage.log
Created attachment 754882 [details]
File: syslog
I can start installer if I type "DISPLAY=:1 anaconda" in tty Proposed as a Blocker for 19-final by Fedora user ignatenkobrain using the blocker tracking app because: Installer must be start Can you please re-try this with a different USB stick and confirm whether it still happens? We can't see an obvious reason for this problem and we haven't seen any other reports of it, so it may be to do with your stick. Discussed at 2013-05-30 blocker review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-05-30/f19final-blocker-review-1.1.2013-05-30-16.02.log.txt . Agreed to delay blocker evaluation for further input from the reporter and the babel developers. >Can you please re-try this with a different USB stick and confirm whether it still happens?
Yes, it still happens. I've also tried another USB slot.
Looks very strange to me - I can't think of a reason right now why this should happen in Babel (short of corrupt data or some OS bug). I assume the F19 beta netinst should be ok to reproduce that? Is there anyone else who can reproduce the issue? so far this is the only report we have, but I'll try and test it later. I don't think I've tested a dd'ed netinst.iso yet. I've tried this USB on another laptop, it works perfectly. Problem with my hardware? Discussed at 2013-06-03 blocker review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-06-03/f19final-blocker-review-2.2013-06-03-16.00.log.txt . As no-one's been able to reproduce this and even the reporter can't on another system, this is tentatively rejected as a blocker: it can reproduced if we find more people are hitting it. Alexey: it kinda looks that way. Have you tested the memory on the affected system? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 963267 *** |