Bug 970846

Summary: ucarp - failure of 1 node in a 3 node cluster results in 2 masters
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Cam McK <cam.mckenzie+bugzilla>
Component: ucarpAssignee: Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 18CC: fabian.deutsch, gwync
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-05 06:54:11 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Cam McK 2013-06-05 04:42:09 UTC
Description of problem:
* ucarp isn't honouring "--advskew" 
* failure of 1 node in a 3 node cluster results in 2 masters

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ucarp 1.5.2 - Oct 25 2012

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
Run a 3 node cluster with following parameters:
host 1: ucarp -k 15 -s -v 1 -p badpass -a
host 2: ucarp -k 10 -s -v 1 -p badpass -a
host 3: ucarp -k 5 -s -v 1 -p badpass -a

* Bring up host 2 first, then host 3 and then host 1.
* Kill ucarp on host 2
* host 1 and host 3 both switch to masters 

= When run as a service =
within vip-common.conf set the OPTIONS parameter as:

host1: OPTIONS="--shutdown --advskew 15"
host2: OPTIONS="--shutdown --advskew 5"
host3: OPTIONS="--shutdown --advskew 10"

* start ucarp service on host2, host3, host1
* host2 execute: service ucarp stop

Both host1 and host3 become masters

* Bring host2 back online and host1 and host3 return to backup

Expected results:
Online one master to take over VIP after a node failure

Comment 1 Cam McK 2013-06-05 06:07:48 UTC
Just to expand on this:

The hosts in question are KVM guests. The KVM server is also Fedora 18 (3.9.4-200.fc18.x86_64) It seems that could be a kernel bug as I have the same issues when using keepalived. 

My keepalived symptoms are the same as noted here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.keepalived.devel/3815

Comment 2 Cam McK 2013-06-05 06:54:11 UTC
Given the circumstances I think this bug is a duplicate of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 880035 ***