Bug 972536
| Summary: | Some symbols are hidden, but pkgconfig reports old version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Scott K Logan <logans> |
| Component: | assimp | Assignee: | Rich Mattes <richmattes> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 19 | CC: | richmattes |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | assimp-2.0.863-10.20110824svn.fc19 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-07-17 03:12:27 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Scott K Logan
2013-06-09 22:42:15 UTC
So if memory serves me correctly, assimp 2.0.853 was the last "released" version of the assimp 2.0 series, downloadable on their sourceforge project page. However, 1071 was the first SVN revision where they split their models between free and nonfree, which allowed me to delete the non-free models and submit the package to Fedora. This is why the SVN snapshot is packaged instead of the last released -863 version. SVN revision 1255 is quite different from rev 1071 that is packaged, and is really much closer to assimp 3.0 (which is svn revision 1270) than assimp 2.0. Indeed, it looks like most of the patches do not apply cleanly to svn revision 1255, so it will take some time if I go that route. For this reason, I think I would prefer just setting the patch version of the current package to 1071 in CMakeLists.txt for f19 and lower, and rebuilding. Is this satisfactory, or would you rather see the package upgraded? That will solve my issue, thank you! By the way, I discovered this while compiling ROS Groovy for F19 - AFAIK, it is the only problem in the entire process. Thanks for your help here, I'll submit a patch to ROS to fix their end of this issue as well! Alright I'll go ahead and update the patch version in CMakeLists.txt. We're about halfway through getting the fuerte base packages into Fedora, and hope to get to groovy in to f20, so this should definitely help. assimp-2.0.863-10.20110824svn.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/assimp-2.0.863-10.20110824svn.fc19 Package assimp-2.0.863-10.20110824svn.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing assimp-2.0.863-10.20110824svn.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12532/assimp-2.0.863-10.20110824svn.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). assimp-2.0.863-10.20110824svn.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |