Bug 972650
Summary: | Review Request: sugar-tuxmath - TuxMath is an arcade game that helps people practice their math facts. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Danishka Navin <danishka> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | danishka, package-review, rosser.bjr |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-05-07 21:20:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449, 1364745 |
Description
Danishka Navin
2013-06-10 10:43:16 UTC
1) See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python , you will find now its recommended to use python2 not just python in macros so if you have python macro %{__python} change it to %{__python2} 2) This package failed to build because of wrong BR: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 You can identify what correct BR: you can use in your package spec by just looking into setup.py file of upstream source if it contains lines starting with following code from sugar.activity this mean you should use BR: sugar-toolkit if it contains lines starting with following code from sugar3.activity this mean you should use BR: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 So, use correct BuildRequires: sugar-toolkit and this package will build fine. 3) also, this package uses bundled libraries which is not accepted in Fedora. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries Work with upstream to have this package built against system libraries. Are you still interested in this review? Yes,I would like to resume working on this. There was no response on the other ticket (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843646), so I'm going to close this one out too. If you'd like to re-submit, please feel free to open a new ticket. |