Bug 97588
Summary: | Figure 3-2. HTTP Proxy Configuration | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite 5 | Reporter: | vivian_huang <vivian.huang> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Clay Murphy <cmurphy> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | alikins, cturner, rhn-bugs, veillard |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Documentation |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://rhn.redhat.com/help/enterprise/applet.html#APPLET-CONFIGURING | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-07-07 21:03:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 88664 |
Description
vivian_huang
2003-06-18 01:29:38 UTC
same error exists in the enterprise Document too, please check it. I'm accepting the bug and blocking the Titan Documentation tracking bug. This looks like legacy text that contradicts the example in the screenshot itself. Will be an easy fix. OK, so this fix wasn't difficult, as expected. But I searched through the User Guide just to make sure we're consistent and found that we use virtually identical examples while explaining how to configure an HTTP Proxy for up2date and rhn_register. So I'm changing the status to NEEDINFO and CC'ing Chip, Daniel, and Adrian in the hopes of ensuring the examples included in the up2date and rhn_register chapters are indeed accurate. The references I'm requesting review of can be found in the latest RHN Enterprise User Reference Guide posted on the intranet: http://intranet.corp.redhat.com/redhat/images/wiki/RHNEnterpriseURG.pdf They are on pages 8, 29, and 74. All I need to know is whether or not "http://" should be included in the HTTP Proxy field. Thanks. OK, Adrian let me know up2date and rhn_register actually expect "http://" in that field, so no further changes are needed. The files are checked into CVS for this. I'm changing status to ON_DEV in preparation for build -48 at GDK's request. Looks good in webqa and on -48. Looks good in prod. |