Bug 977739
Summary: | jetty: incorrect license tag | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michal Srb <msrb> |
Component: | jetty | Assignee: | Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | java-sig-commits, kdaniel, mizdebsk, msrb, overholt, sochotni, tcallawa, tradej |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-06-26 05:20:35 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michal Srb
2013-06-25 09:03:42 UTC
Blocking FE-LEGAL Above mentioned file contains following header: /* * @(#)UnixCrypt.java 0.9 96/11/25 * * Copyright (c) 1996 Aki Yoshida. All rights reserved. * * Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software * for non-commercial or commercial purposes and without fee is * hereby granted provided that this copyright notice appears in * all copies. */ Could someone please check whether this license is OK for Fedora? I am not quite sure about "for non-commercial or commercial purposes *and without fee*" part. Thanks Yeah, this is fine. Badly worded, but the intent is clear. Use MIT as the License tag. Lifting FE-Legal. Thanks for clarification. I have noticed that jetty-util contains another MIT licensed file and license tag for this particular subpackage is correct. Rest of the project is ASL 2.0 or EPL licensed. Closing this as NOTABUG. |