Bug 978674

Summary: It is easy misunderstanding to use 192.168.1.0 for CONTROLLER_ADDRESS
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Hangbin Liu <haliu>
Component: doc-Getting_Started_GuideAssignee: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: breeler, sgordon
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation, Triaged
Target Release: 4.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-06 18:50:27 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1011085    

Description Hangbin Liu 2013-06-27 04:18:43 UTC
Document URL: 
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_OpenStack_Preview/3/html/Getting_Started_Guide/chap-Running_PackStack.html#sect-Quick_Start_Deployment_using_PackStack

Section Number and Name: 
Example 4.2. Multiple Node Deployment

Describe the issue: 
When we use 192.168.1.0, if no specific description, most people will think it is a subnet address, rather than a host address.

Suggestions for improvement: 

Use 192.168.1.1 instead.

Additional information:

Comment 2 Stephen Gordon 2013-08-06 18:50:27 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 978670 ***