Bug 987411
Summary: | Current openssl version does not support 'Next Protocol Negotiation'. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Craig Taylor <craig.taylor> |
Component: | openssl | Assignee: | Tomas Mraz <tmraz> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Alicja Kario <hkario> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.4 | CC: | hkario |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | openssl-1.0.1e-11.el6 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: |
Feature:
As a result of rebase to openssl-1.0.1e upstream the Next Protocol Negotiation extension of TLS protocol is now supported by OpenSSL. This extension allows to negotiate which application protocol will be used by the application already during the TLS handshake.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-11-21 09:23:44 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Craig Taylor
2013-07-23 11:02:16 UTC
The man page fix is not present in openssl-1.0.1e-10.el6 The patch is available here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=780726 as an attachment for bug 924250. Fixed. I'm assuming that we'll see TLSv1.2 and GCM ciphers come through with this version: Any idea of the release details, is this likely RHEL 6.5 or an independent errata update? Thank you... I notice this version is in the 6.5 beta... Yes, it is planned to be released in RHEL-6.5. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1585.html |