Bug 990984

Summary:	Report error when configure network with static IPv6 mode
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	wanghui <huiwa>
Component:	ovirt-node	Assignee:	Joey Boggs <jboggs>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	3.5.0	CC:	bsarathy, cshao, ecohen, fdeutsch, gklein, gouyang, hadong, huiwa, iheim, jboggs, leiwang, lsurette, ovirt-maint, rbalakri, yaniwang, ycui
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	3.5.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	node
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-02-11 20:46:32 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Node	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1123329, 1142923, 1156165

Description wanghui 2013-08-01 10:40:14 UTC

Description of problem:
It reports "An error appeared in the UI: < InvalidData 'The field must contain a valid IPv6 address or an empty string.'>" when configure network with static IPv6 mode.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20130725.0.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install rhevh6.5.
2. Select a NIC and configure it with IPv6 Static mode.
   Bootprotocol :   ( ) Disabled   ( ) Auto     ( ) DHCP      ( ) Static
   IP Address   :   2001::10            Netmask :       64
   Gateway      :   2001::1

Actual results:
1. After step2, it reports "An error appeared in the UI: < InvalidData 'The field must contain a valid IPv6 address or an empty string.'> ".

Expected results:
1. After step2, it can set ipv6 address with static mode successfully.

Additional info:

Comment 5 wanghui 2013-11-04 02:39:53 UTC

Test version:
rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20131031.1
ovirt-node-3.0.1-7.el6.noarch

Test steps:
1. Install rhevh6.5.
2. Select a NIC and configure it with IPv6 Static mode.
   Bootprotocol :   ( ) Disabled   ( ) Auto     ( ) DHCP      (*) Static
   IP Address   :   2001::100           Netmask :       48
   Gateway      :   2001::1

Test result:
1. After step2, it can set IPv6 address successfully.

This bug is fixed in rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20131031.1. So I will change the status from ON_QA to VERIFIED.

Comment 7 wanghui 2014-01-13 11:39:32 UTC

Re-verify this issue.

Test version:
rhevh-6.5-20140110.1.iso
ovirt-node-3.0.1-16.el6_5.noarch

Test steps:
1. Install rhevh-6.5-20140110.1.iso.
2. Select a NIC and configure it with IPv6 Static mode.
   Bootprotocol :   ( ) Disabled   ( ) Auto     ( ) DHCP      (*) Static
   IP Address   :   2001::100           Netmask :       64
   Gateway      :   2001::1

Test result:
1. After step2, it can set IPv6 address successfully.

This bug is fixed in rhevh-6.5-20140110.1.iso.

Comment 9 Ying Cui 2014-07-29 11:19:18 UTC

Change this bug back to ON_QA, due to this bug flag is changed to rhev 3.5, we need to test and verify this bug on rhevh 7.0 and node 3.1.

Comment 10 wanghui 2014-12-18 06:20:37 UTC

Test Version:
rhev-hypervisor6-6.6-20141212.0.iso
ovirt-node-3.1.0-0.34.20141210git0c9c493.el6.noarch

Test step:
1. Install rhev-hypervisor6-6.6-20141212.0.iso.
2. Select a NIC and configure it with IPv6 Static mode.
   Bootprotocol :   ( ) Disabled   ( ) Auto     ( ) DHCP      (*) Static
   IP Address   :   2001::100           Netmask :       64
   Gateway      :   2001::1

Test result:
1. After step2, it can setup IPv6 address as static mode successfully.

So this issue is fixed in rhev-hypervisor6-6.6-20141212.0.iso. Also check no such issue in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20141212.0.iso. Change the status from ON_QA to Verified.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-02-11 20:46:32 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0160.html