Bug 991927

Summary:	389-admin: FTBFS in rawhide
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Dennis Gilmore <dennis>
Component:	389-admin	Assignee:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	awilliam, mreynolds, nhosoi, nkinder, ppisar, rmeggins
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-08-20 20:53:54 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	991858

Description Dennis Gilmore 2013-08-05 02:57:49 UTC

Your package 389-admin failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5694267

Build logs:
root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/root.log
build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/build.log
state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/state.log
NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Petr Pisar 2013-08-06 10:51:45 UTC

configure: checking for ADMINUTIL...
checking for --with-adminutil... no
checking for adminutil with pkg-config... checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/i686-redhat-linux-gnu-pkg-config
configure: error: ADMINUTIL not found, specify with --with-adminutil.

Missing a dependency?

Comment 2 Adam Williamson (Red Hat non-Fedora) 2013-08-06 21:14:55 UTC

I don't think it's a missing dependency, the package has:

BuildRequires:    389-adminutil-devel

I note, though, that the pkgconfig file is /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/389-adminutil.pc - perhaps the library's pkgconfig name changed and 389-admin's build scripts weren't adjusted?

Comment 3 Rich Megginson 2013-08-06 21:21:01 UTC

(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #2)
> I don't think it's a missing dependency, the package has:
> 
> BuildRequires:    389-adminutil-devel
> 
> I note, though, that the pkgconfig file is
> /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/389-adminutil.pc - perhaps the library's pkgconfig name
> changed and 389-admin's build scripts weren't adjusted?

It's been this way since . . . F-14?  And now all of a sudden in F-20 it stops working?

Comment 4 Adam Williamson (Red Hat non-Fedora) 2013-08-06 21:41:40 UTC

See comments #5 and #6 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991928 . I did as much digging into this as I could manage. Hope it helps.

Comment 5 Rich Megginson 2013-08-07 20:58:38 UTC

Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47465

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-08-20 19:51:50 UTC

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2013-08-20 19:52:23 UTC

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-09-30 00:36:33 UTC

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-01-14 08:40:21 UTC

389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.