Bug 991927

Summary: 389-admin: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dennis Gilmore <dennis>
Component: 389-adminAssignee: Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: awilliam, mreynolds, nhosoi, nkinder, ppisar, rmeggins
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-20 20:53:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 991858    

Description Dennis Gilmore 2013-08-05 02:57:49 UTC
Your package 389-admin failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5694267

Build logs:
root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/root.log
build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/build.log
state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4267/5694267/state.log
NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Petr Pisar 2013-08-06 10:51:45 UTC
configure: checking for ADMINUTIL...
checking for --with-adminutil... no
checking for adminutil with pkg-config... checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/i686-redhat-linux-gnu-pkg-config
configure: error: ADMINUTIL not found, specify with --with-adminutil.

Missing a dependency?

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2013-08-06 21:14:55 UTC
I don't think it's a missing dependency, the package has:

BuildRequires:    389-adminutil-devel

I note, though, that the pkgconfig file is /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/389-adminutil.pc - perhaps the library's pkgconfig name changed and 389-admin's build scripts weren't adjusted?

Comment 3 Rich Megginson 2013-08-06 21:21:01 UTC
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #2)
> I don't think it's a missing dependency, the package has:
> 
> BuildRequires:    389-adminutil-devel
> 
> I note, though, that the pkgconfig file is
> /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/389-adminutil.pc - perhaps the library's pkgconfig name
> changed and 389-admin's build scripts weren't adjusted?

It's been this way since . . . F-14?  And now all of a sudden in F-20 it stops working?

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2013-08-06 21:41:40 UTC
See comments #5 and #6 on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991928 . I did as much digging into this as I could manage. Hope it helps.

Comment 5 Rich Megginson 2013-08-07 20:58:38 UTC
Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47465

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-08-20 19:51:50 UTC
389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2013-08-20 19:52:23 UTC
389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-09-30 00:36:33 UTC
389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-01-14 08:40:21 UTC
389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.