Bug 994018
Summary: | pam_mapi possibly affected by F-20 unversioned docdir change | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta> |
Component: | pam_mapi | Assignee: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | redhat-bugzilla, ville.skytta |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
URL: | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | pam_mapi-0.1.2-4.fc20 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-08-06 17:47:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 993551 |
Description
Ville Skyttä
2013-08-06 13:56:36 UTC
Ville, which macro can be used across old and new behaviour? From what I get, %_docdir_fmt can not be used directly in *.spec files. Is known how RHEL 7 is going to behave regarding this? Will they also switch? (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #1) > Ville, which macro can be used across old and new behaviour? See first link in the initial comment, and the "Detailed Description" section in it. I'd imagine if you use plain %doc or %{_pkgdocdir} as suggested, you don't need to know what EL7 is going to do (I don't). Sorry, did not recognize the new %{_pkgdocdir} macro. |