Bug 995118

Summary: [RFE] Some mandatory fields are not highlighted in reports new filter menu
Product: [Retired] Subscription Asset Manager Reporter: Pavlina Bartikova <pbartiko>
Component: SpliceAssignee: Splice Developers <splice-devel>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: mkovacik
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.3CC: bkearney, cduryee, pbartiko
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-10-01 11:17:43 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
sam screenshot none

Description Pavlina Bartikova 2013-08-08 14:57:26 UTC 
Description of problem:
When adding a new filter in reports, some mandatory fields are not highlighted (LifeCycle State, Search by).

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Administer -> Reports
2. +NewFilter

Actual results:
Mandatory fields should be highlighted (only Name and Subscription Status are).

Expected results:
Some mandatory fields are not highlighted.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Chris Duryee 2013-08-08 18:48:29 UTC 
Pavlina,

Can you attach a screenshot? I don't see any highlighted fields on my machine.
Comment 2 Pavlina Bartikova 2013-08-09 10:57:18 UTC 
Created attachment 784793 [details]
sam screenshot

"Name" and "Subscription Status" are highlighted (boldface). The other majority fields should be highlighted too.

(I'm using SAM-1.3.0-RHEL-6-20130805.0-SAM-x86_64-dvd1.iso)
Comment 3 Chris Duryee 2013-08-14 16:18:02 UTC 
Pavlina,

This is somewhat related to #995132. In #995132, there were multiple validators for a couple of fields, which resulting in multiple messages being printed. I removed the extraneous validators, but this caused the bolding for all fields to disappear as well.

Is this ok to leave all fields without bold text? I think it is ok since some of the fields are either/or, and do not benefit from being bolded (example: the radio buttons)

marking as MODIFIED since #995132 is modified.
Comment 4 Pavlina Bartikova 2013-08-21 13:26:37 UTC 
Confirmed. All fields are without bold text.

Moving bug to VERIFIED.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-10-01 11:17:43 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-1390.html