Bug 995118 - [RFE] Some mandatory fields are not highlighted in reports new filter menu
Summary: [RFE] Some mandatory fields are not highlighted in reports new filter menu
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Subscription Asset Manager
Classification: Retired
Component: Splice
Version: 1.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Splice Developers
QA Contact: mkovacik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-08 14:57 UTC by Pavlina Bartikova
Modified: 2013-10-01 11:17 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-10-01 11:17:43 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
sam screenshot (53.98 KB, image/png)
2013-08-09 10:57 UTC, Pavlina Bartikova
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2013:1390 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Release 1.3 of Subscription Asset Manager 2013-10-01 14:43:14 UTC

Description Pavlina Bartikova 2013-08-08 14:57:26 UTC
Description of problem:
When adding a new filter in reports, some mandatory fields are not highlighted (LifeCycle State, Search by).

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Administer -> Reports
2. +NewFilter

Actual results:
Mandatory fields should be highlighted (only Name and Subscription Status are).

Expected results:
Some mandatory fields are not highlighted.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Chris Duryee 2013-08-08 18:48:29 UTC
Pavlina,

Can you attach a screenshot? I don't see any highlighted fields on my machine.

Comment 2 Pavlina Bartikova 2013-08-09 10:57:18 UTC
Created attachment 784793 [details]
sam screenshot

"Name" and "Subscription Status" are highlighted (boldface). The other majority fields should be highlighted too.

(I'm using SAM-1.3.0-RHEL-6-20130805.0-SAM-x86_64-dvd1.iso)

Comment 3 Chris Duryee 2013-08-14 16:18:02 UTC
Pavlina,

This is somewhat related to #995132. In #995132, there were multiple validators for a couple of fields, which resulting in multiple messages being printed. I removed the extraneous validators, but this caused the bolding for all fields to disappear as well.

Is this ok to leave all fields without bold text? I think it is ok since some of the fields are either/or, and do not benefit from being bolded (example: the radio buttons)

marking as MODIFIED since #995132 is modified.

Comment 4 Pavlina Bartikova 2013-08-21 13:26:37 UTC
Confirmed. All fields are without bold text.

Moving bug to VERIFIED.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-10-01 11:17:43 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-1390.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.