Bug 995828

Summary: transmission-2.82 is available
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring>
Component: transmissionAssignee: Rahul Sundaram <metherid>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: abdulkarimmemon, charles, jspaleta, kumarpraveen.nitdgp, metherid, raghusiddarth, sanjay.ankur
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-15 11:42:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2013-08-11 10:41:41 UTC
Latest upstream release: 2.82
Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 2.81-3.fc20
URL: http://www.transmissionbt.com/download/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Comment 1 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-08-15 00:53:27 UTC
On it.

Comment 2 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-08-15 01:28:25 UTC
The QT project file doesn't appear to be updated. The build fails with QT5 related errors. 

Build.log: http://ur1.ca/f25wm

I'll file a ticket with upstream and build once I can fix this. 


@Rahul: Once done, would you want me to push this update to F19 also?

Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur

Comment 3 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-08-15 01:39:23 UTC
After a short conversation on #transmission, I've found that there's indeed something wrong with the QT side of things. The solution is to use an svn patch. 

Rahul: is it worth updating and carrying a patch or should we just wait for the next release that will hopefully fix this part?

Ankur

Comment 4 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-08-15 11:42:22 UTC
Built for rawhide. I wouldn't suggest passing this on to F19 though. I recommend we should wait for another release where the qt5 part is fixed up.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=456843