Bug 1000009 - Jcr2vfs migration tool does not migrate 'globals'
Summary: Jcr2vfs migration tool does not migrate 'globals'
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss BRMS Platform 6
Classification: Retired
Component: Business Central
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
high
Target Milestone: ER6
: 6.0.0
Assignee: Neus Miras
QA Contact: Petr Široký
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-22 13:53 UTC by Petr Široký
Modified: 2014-08-06 20:17 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-06 20:17:12 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Repository with some globals in package 'org.guvnor.example2' (473.59 KB, application/zip)
2013-08-22 13:55 UTC, Petr Široký
no flags Details

Description Petr Široký 2013-08-22 13:53:34 UTC
Description of problem:
When I setup a list of global statements for some package in Guvnor 5.x I would expect it to be migrated into "globals.gdrl" (or similar) file in vfs repo, but no such file is created during migration.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.0.0-ER1 (and community 6.0.0-SNAPSHOT)


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use the attached repo or create the globals by hand in Guvnor 5.x.
2. Run the migration tool with the above repo as input.


Actual results:
No "globals.gdrl" (or similar) created in vfs repo.


Expected results:
File with global statements somewhere in vfs repo.

Comment 1 Petr Široký 2013-08-22 13:55:17 UTC
Created attachment 789208 [details]
Repository with some globals in package 'org.guvnor.example2'

Comment 6 Petr Široký 2013-12-05 17:15:51 UTC
It seems the globals are still not correctly migrated. At least the UI (Business Central) is not able to load them. To be honest I am not even sure how should the globals work in 6.x, so I will need to look at that first. I will move this BZ back to assign once I have clear picture of how the globals should be handled.

Comment 7 Petr Široký 2014-01-14 10:52:17 UTC
Verified fixed in 6.0.0-ER7.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.