Bug 10002 - shadow(5) and usermod(8) lie about sp_inact
Summary: shadow(5) and usermod(8) lie about sp_inact
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: shadow-utils
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2000-03-06 06:24 UTC by Todd C. Miller
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-03-06 06:24:51 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Todd C. Miller 2000-03-06 06:24:51 UTC
The description of sp_inact in shadow(5) and usermod(8) does not match the
behavior of Linux-PAM.  In the pam_unix module, sp_inact is used in
conjunction with sp_max to check whether or not a user's account should be
treated as expired.  The documentation, however, indicates that sp_inact is
used in conjunction with sp_expire which is not the case.  Knowing what
that field does by source inspection I suppose I can see how what is in the
man page *might* be interpreted as the real behavior, but it is a stretch.
It is worth noting that Solaris (and other SVR4-based systems) use sp_inact
for something completely different, but that's really a separate issue.

Comment 1 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 2000-10-05 12:39:01 UTC
Fixed in rawhide


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.