Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1000323
Subpackage evolution-devel is no longer multilib-clean for all multilib arches
Last modified: 2013-11-20 23:55:30 EST
Description of problem: 7 files now have non-equal 32/64bit content where all matched before: /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eshell/ix01.html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eshell/ch05.html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eshell/ch04.html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eshell/ch03.html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eshell/ch02.html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eshell/ch01.html /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eshell/EShellView.html Also for s390 vs s390x Multilib difference for usr/share/applications/evolution-settings.desktop on s390x vs s390: --- /usr/share/applications/evolution-settings.desktop on s390x 2013-07-24 06:59:38.394323987 -0400 +++ /usr/share/applications/evolution-settings.desktop on s390 2013-07-24 06:58:41.220369995 -0400 @@ -1,87 +1,6 @@ [Desktop Entry] Name=Email Settings -Name[bg]=Настройки на е-поща -Name[bn]=ইমেইল সেটিংসমূহ -Name[ca]=Paràmetres del correu electrònic -Name[ca@valencia]=Paràmetres del correu electrònic -Name[cs]=Nastavení pošty -Name[da]=Indstillinger for e-post -Name[de]=E-Mail-Einstellungen -Name[el]=Ρυθμίσεις αλληλογραφίας -Name[en@shaw]= details at https://errata.devel.redhat.com/rpmdiff/show/76940?result_id=1614914 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): evolution-2.32.3-21.el6 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Not sure if this is an gtk-doc issue or one can force gtk-doc to generate exactly the same doc Expected results: doc files must be the same Additional info: it might be workarounded by adding noarch subpackage with doc
OK, I'll split docs to evolution-devel-docs and drop the evolution-settings, it's not that useful and it's dropped in current upstream version as well.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1540.html