Hide Forgot
Duplicate documentation files have been detected in the package builds for Rawhide and Fedora 20. The likely cause is the unversioned docdirs change in Fedora 20. If your package %installs documentation files into %{_docdir}/%{name}/ to store them in a subpackage, this now conflicts with using the %doc macro in the base package. Since Fedora 20, the %doc macro installs into the unversioned %{_docdir}/%{name}/ and includes everything in that directory. One obvious fix is to decide between either using %doc or installing into %{_docdir}/%{name}/ manually as explained in the Packaging tricks Wiki section (for past dist releases and the versioned docdir). General discussion of this problem: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338 Further information: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Installing_documentation:_2_paths [semi-automated bug report] [...] => kicad-2013.06.11-3.rev4021.fc20.src.rpm => kicad-doc-2013.06.11-3.rev4021.fc20.noarch in fedora-development-i386 File conflict with: kicad-2013.06.11-3.rev4021.fc20.i686 /usr/share/doc/kicad/help/en/kicad.pdf => kicad-2013.06.11-3.rev4021.fc20.src.rpm => kicad-2013.06.11-3.rev4021.fc20.i686 in fedora-development-i386 File conflict with: kicad-doc-2013.06.11-3.rev4021.fc20.noarch /usr/share/doc/kicad/help/en/kicad.pdf
Looks like an easy fix. Removing from tracker ticket, since the docdir is non-versioned, and there are several other packaging issues: * package -doc sets wrong Group tag, should be "Documentation * package -doc should not require "kicad", so the documentation can be installed and viewed independently * none of the -doc-XX subpackages for non-English languages should depend on the -doc package. If that has been done only for directory ownership, please notice https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function in other words, you may add a "%dir %{_docdir}/%{name}" entry to each -doc-XX package instead of depending on the -doc package * BuildRoot definition, emptying and the %clean section are not needed anymore, not for EL6 either https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean * package "kicad" executes ldconfig in scriptlets. Why? It doesn't install any shared libs in run-time linker's search path. And for the extended search path that adds %_libdir/kicad/, ldconfig doesn't need to be called, because the dir is empty. * %defattr is not needed anymore for any of the active dist releases including EL5+6 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions * files below %_docdir are marked as documentation automatically, no need to use %doc for such paths * why does the base package duplicate %{_docdir}/%{name}/help/en/kicad.pdf? If that file is a hard requirement, it must not be stored in docdir, since RPM may be configured to --excludedocs. a file that MUST be available at run-time would need to be stored elsewhere and not below /usr/share/doc
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #1) > Looks like an easy fix. Removing from tracker ticket, since the docdir is > non-versioned, and there are several other packaging issues: > > > * package -doc sets wrong Group tag, should be "Documentation Fixed. > * package -doc should not require "kicad", so the documentation can be > installed and viewed independently I don't agree, but fixed. > * none of the -doc-XX subpackages for non-English languages should depend on > the -doc package. If that has been done only for directory ownership, please > notice > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your > _package_to_function > > in other words, you may add a "%dir %{_docdir}/%{name}" entry to each > -doc-XX package instead of depending on the -doc package doc-XX depends on doc because translations are poor Won't fix. > * BuildRoot definition, emptying and the %clean section are not needed > anymore, not for EL6 either > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean Fixed. > * package "kicad" executes ldconfig in scriptlets. Why? It doesn't install > any shared libs in run-time linker's search path. And for the extended > search path that adds %_libdir/kicad/, ldconfig doesn't need to be called, > because the dir is empty. Fixed. > * %defattr is not needed anymore for any of the active dist releases > including EL5+6 > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions Fixed. > * files below %_docdir are marked as documentation automatically, no need to > use %doc for such paths Fixed. > * why does the base package duplicate %{_docdir}/%{name}/help/en/kicad.pdf? > If that file is a hard requirement, it must not be stored in docdir, since > RPM may be configured to --excludedocs. a file that MUST be available at > run-time would need to be stored elsewhere and not below /usr/share/doc Fixed. Thanks for this review ;-)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6329086 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6329106
kicad-2013.06.11-4.rev4021.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kicad-2013.06.11-4.rev4021.fc20
Package kicad-2013.06.11-4.rev4021.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing kicad-2013.06.11-4.rev4021.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23944/kicad-2013.06.11-4.rev4021.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
kicad-2013.06.11-4.rev4021.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.