Created attachment 915759 [details] Comment (This comment was longer than 65,535 characters and has been moved to an attachment by Red Hat Bugzilla).
Created attachment 836507 [details] proposed spec changes This package is quite a mess. :( The initial "no base package" style would have been better (it is okay with the FPC that development-only packages use the base %name and don't append "-devel"). Alternatively, it would be possible to build only a "tclap" package with a virtual "tclap-devel" package (as in the attached patch). Please fix that.
Thanks, applied the patch as is.