Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-openopt/python-openopt.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-openopt/ Description: A python module for numerical optimization Fedora Account System Username: stevetraylen rpmlint is clean koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5859080 I plan to release for EPEL 6 as well once #1001562 is resolved.
SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python-openopt/python-openopt-0.5092-1.fc19.src.rpm
APPROVED.
I'd like to maintain a Fedora branch of it, can you add this branch? Then you orphan it to me.
Hi Chris, Yes I'm doing the fedora branch as well anyway.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-openopt Short Description: A python module for numerical optimization Owners: stevetraylen Branches: f20 f19 el6
Git done (by process-git-requests).
python-openopt-0.5092-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-openopt-0.5092-1.el6
python-openopt-0.5092-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-openopt-0.5092-1.fc19
Folks, 37 minutes from submission to approval and 2-3 hours to git import! Are you serious or just working carelessly? As it's impossible to perform a careful review in this time, I am guessing on the former. I think FESCO should intervene and stop this practice - It's grossly careless!! Christopher, I am seriously concerned about your "reviews", because the quality of your submissions and postings makes it very clear you are lacking experience and probably are not able to understand what you are doing.
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #9) > Folks, 37 minutes from submission to approval and 2-3 hours to git import! > > Are you serious or just working carelessly? As it's impossible to perform a > careful review in this time, I am guessing on the former. > > > I think FESCO should intervene and stop this practice - It's grossly > careless!! > > Christopher, I am seriously concerned about your "reviews", because the > quality of your submissions and postings makes it very clear you are lacking > experience and probably are not able to understand what you are doing. Hi Ralf, I can't find any errors even warnings from rpmlint. I don't have habit to paste rpmlint everytime, but I will run fedora-review instead. The linpack package, in fact, I don't want to take. Bjorn asked me if I can take on gtalk. I'll prevent such reviews from now on. For this one, what's your problem? You mean we need to wait months just for a python module?
python-openopt-0.5092-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10) > I can't find any errors even warnings from rpmlint. rpmlint is just a hinting tool and so is fedora-review. Them "not complaining" rsp. "complaining", doesn't mean much. These tools are just imperfect tools, whose results often contain bogus warnings and don't catch issue. These tools' results should not be taken to be more than hints. They are not a replacement for visual inspection and further manual checks. If they were, we could close down the review process and rely on them - This is not the case. > For this one, what's your problem? I am accusing you of working overly hasty and to probably not having comprehended the breadth of a review. > You mean we need to wait months just for a python module? No. I am asking you to work more carefully. This also means not to rush through reviews, such that others have a chance to also have an eye on a package. As to err is human, nobody is perfect, so they might see something, which had escaped you.
python-openopt-0.5092-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
python-openopt-0.5092-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-openopt New Branches: epel7 Owners: stevetraylen