Bug 1001807 - FEAT: hwcert-client should indicate why it hasn't defaulted a plan item that is present
Summary: FEAT: hwcert-client should indicate why it hasn't defaulted a plan item that ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Hardware Certification Program
Classification: Retired
Component: Test Suite (harness)
Version: 1.6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Greg Nichols
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1001233
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-27 19:43 UTC by Rob Landry
Modified: 2013-11-13 09:57 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: hwcert-client 1.6.5 R12
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Feature: The hwcert command now provides more feedback when a test is being skipped, marking "pp" to the left of the text name when a test is skipped because it previously passed.
Clone Of:
: 1001831 1002768 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-13 09:57:13 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1515 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE hwcert-client-1.6 bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-13 14:54:06 UTC

Description Rob Landry 2013-08-27 19:43:43 UTC 
Description of problem:

Currently hwcert-client doesn't plan tests it doesn't need, and this is correct however it leaves it as an exercise for the user to determine why it doesn't think it needs to test something.  It would be helpful if it provided some indicator that a test was skipped for what reason.  This way it would be more clear that it isn't a basic hardware detection issue.
Comment 1 Greg Nichols 2013-09-25 01:11:55 UTC 
committed to R12
Comment 5 Brian Brock 2013-10-09 15:15:45 UTC 
verified in -22.el6
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-13 09:57:13 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1515.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.