Bug 1001835
| Summary: | module_name parameter for fence_drac5 is optional, not required | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Jan Pokorný [poki] <jpokorny> |
| Component: | luci | Assignee: | Jan Pokorný [poki] <jpokorny> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.5 | CC: | cluster-maint, fdinitto, rsteiger |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | EasyFix |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | luci-0.26.0-42.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Cause:
Luci incorrectly considers "module_name" (Module Name) parameter of
Dell DRAC 5 fence device to be mandatory.
Consequence:
Such fence device cannot be added with "module_name" omitted.
Fix:
Luci now correctly considers this parameter to be optional.
Result:
Such fence device now can be added with omitted module name.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-11-21 10:33:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jan Pokorný [poki]
2013-08-27 21:46:29 UTC
Situation: - drac5 fence agent is to be added - omit module_name as it is (metadata, documentation) optional, otherwise everything should conform to the set expectations Before: - luci will not accept/validate the user's request (due to module_name being omitted) After: - luci will accept/validate the user's request Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1603.html |