Bug 1002428 - New process definition is added into non-existent package
Summary: New process definition is added into non-existent package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 991013
Alias: None
Product: JBoss BPMS Platform 6
Classification: Retired
Component: jBPM Designer
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 6.0.0
Assignee: Tihomir Surdilovic
QA Contact: Sona Mala
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-29 07:54 UTC by Sona Mala
Modified: 2013-09-03 14:45 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-03 14:45:23 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Process definition with Project Explorer and Properties Bar (72.72 KB, image/png)
2013-08-29 07:54 UTC, Sona Mala
no flags Details

Description Sona Mala 2013-08-29 07:54:33 UTC
Created attachment 791631 [details]
Process definition with Project Explorer and Properties Bar

Description of problem:
If you create new process definition then property "Package" always contains "org.jbpm". No matter in which package you create the process definition or if project contains this package.

See attached screenshot.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
BPMS 6.0.0 ER2

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a new project "myProject" (org.myproject, 1.0)
2. Check that there is not package "org.jbpm"
3. Create new process definition
4. Take a look at property "Package"

Actual results:
Property "Package" contains "org.jbpm".


Expected results:
I hope that this property should correspondent with package in which is process definition created. The highlighted areas in screen shot should contain same text. For:
   - default package - this property should be empty or contains some expression for default package as "defaultPackage" or "<default>" etc.
   - org.myproject - this property should be org.myproject


Additional info:
I think that property "Package" should not be changed by users.

Comment 1 Marek Baluch 2013-08-29 09:03:30 UTC
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991013.

Comment 2 Kris Verlaenen 2013-09-03 14:45:23 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 991013 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.