Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/irstlm/irstlm.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/irstlm/irstlm-5.80.03-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Irstlm is a tool for the estimation, representation, and computation of statistical language models. Fedora Account System Username: jjames
I will review this one :)
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/tim/udv/review/1003057-irstlm/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Perl: [!]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:. Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) missing? ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [!]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: irstlm-5.80.03-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm irstlm-devel-5.80.03-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm irstlm-tools-5.80.03-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm irstlm-5.80.03-1.fc19.src.rpm irstlm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libirstlm.so.0.0.0 exit.5 irstlm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary prune-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary build-lm-qsub.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sort-lm.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lm-stat.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary goograms2ngrams.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dtsel irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary split-dict.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary score-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ngt irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dict irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary merge-sublm.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary compile-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary quantize-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary add-start-end.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary verify-caching irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary build-sublm.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mdtsel.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plsa irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ngram-split.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rm-start-end.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary build-lm.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary interpolate-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tlm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary split-ngt.sh 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 27 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint irstlm-devel irstlm irstlm-tools irstlm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation irstlm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libirstlm.so.0.0.0 exit.5 irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary prune-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary build-lm-qsub.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sort-lm.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lm-stat.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary goograms2ngrams.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dtsel irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary split-dict.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary score-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ngt irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dict irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary merge-sublm.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary compile-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary quantize-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary add-start-end.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary verify-caching irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary build-sublm.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mdtsel.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary plsa irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ngram-split.pl irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rm-start-end.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary build-lm.sh irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary interpolate-lm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tlm irstlm-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary split-ngt.sh 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 27 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- irstlm-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): irstlm(x86-64) libirstlm.so.0()(64bit) irstlm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.3.3)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) irstlm-tools (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/bash /usr/bin/perl irstlm(x86-64) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libirstlm.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) perl(File::Basename) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(strict) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- irstlm-devel: irstlm-devel irstlm-devel(x86-64) irstlm: irstlm irstlm(x86-64) libirstlm.so.0()(64bit) irstlm-tools: irstlm-tools irstlm-tools(x86-64) AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found ------------------------------ AC_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: irstlm-5.80.03/configure.in:19 Source checksums ---------------- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/irstlm/irstlm-5.80.03.tgz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 500c64e90cae73c2f06ed34ad078423cc100f4e16e6dd98a9e466b17367d31e7 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 500c64e90cae73c2f06ed34ad078423cc100f4e16e6dd98a9e466b17367d31e7
Issues: Perl: [!]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:. Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) missing? The tools package contains perls scripts, so it must require perl Generic: [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools
$ cat *.pl | grep -i "^use " | sort | uniq use File::Basename; use Getopt::Long "GetOptions"; use strict; I am no perl expert but i think you need Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) Requires: perl(File::Basename) Requires: perlGetopt::Long) Requires: perl(strict) They are all provided by perl, but that can change in the future
(In reply to Tim Lauridsen from comment #3) > Issues: > Perl: > [!]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:. > Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; > echo > $version)) missing? No, that is required for perl modules. This package does not contain any modules, just scripts. > The tools package contains perls scripts, so it must require perl The autogenerated Requires include /usr/bin/perl (see the Requires section at the bottom of comment 2), which is sufficient. > Generic: > [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros > Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. > See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools Fixed. (In reply to Tim Lauridsen from comment #4) > $ cat *.pl | grep -i "^use " | sort | uniq > use File::Basename; > use Getopt::Long "GetOptions"; > use strict; > > I am no perl expert but i think you need > > Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo > $version)) > Requires: perl(File::Basename) > Requires: perlGetopt::Long) > Requires: perl(strict) > > They are all provided by perl, but that can change in the future The autogenerated dependencies already include the last 3, and the first one isn't needed since there is no perl module. New URLs: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/irstlm/irstlm.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/irstlm/irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc21.src.rpm
Missed the autogenerated deps :) APPROVED
No worries. Thanks for the review, Tim! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: irstlm Short Description: Statistical language model tool Owners: jjames Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc20
irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc19
irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.
irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
irstlm-5.80.03-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.