Description of problem:
When running `openssl speed`, the reported performance is much lower than one achieved by encrypting /dev/zero using `openssl enc`.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openssl-1.0.1e-10.el6

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. openssl speed aes-128
2. dd if=/dev/zero bs=8129 count=$((1024*1024*1024/8192)) | openssl enc -aes-128-cbc -k test > /dev/null


Actual results:
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 16 size blocks: 22353040 aes-128 cbc's in 2.99s
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 6053019 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 1634296 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 885989 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 109596 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
built on: Mon Sep  2 09:53:33 EDT 2013
options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx) 
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes
aes-128 cbc     119614.93k   129131.07k   139459.93k   302417.58k   299270.14k


131072+0 records in
131072+0 records out
1065484288 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.35492 s, 452 MB/s

Expected results:
openssl speed being faster than openssl enc

Additional info:
When using the `openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc` I get performance of around 640MiB/s so it looks to me that the "standard" encryption routines don't support AES-NI acceleration.