Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/qtbrowserplugin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/qtbrowserplugin-2.4-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: The QtBrowserPlugin solution is useful for implementing plugins for web browser. Fedora Account System Username: orion
1.BuildRequires: qt4-devel. 2.Is there any reason of %{_libdir}/*.a ?
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) > 1.BuildRequires: qt4-devel. No, it's qt-devel. Although I suppose I'm tied to version 4 via qmake-qt4. I'd prefer to keep it as is though. > 2.Is there any reason of %{_libdir}/*.a ? Lazy. Changed. * Thu Sep 5 2013 Orion Poplawski <orion.com> - 2.4-2 - Use explicit name for library file http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/qtbrowserplugin.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/qtbrowserplugin-2.4-2.fc19.src.rpm
Looking. . .
- rpmlint checks return: qtbrowserplugin.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: qtbrowserplugin-2.4-80592b0e7145fb876ea0e84a6e3dadfd5f7481b6.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. Expected, git snapshot. qtbrowserplugin-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable creation of the debuginfo package. This might be inevitable given how it's build, but check it out. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( BSD ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r So just the debuginfo package.
As near as I can determine, debuginfo is just not generated for static libraries because they are not executable ELF files.
Reasonable. APPROVED.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: qtbrowserplugin Short Description: Qt Solutions Component: Browser Plugin Owners: orion Branches: f20 f19 f18 el6 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
qtbrowserplugin-2.4-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtbrowserplugin-2.4-2.fc20
Package qtbrowserplugin-2.4-2.fc20: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing qtbrowserplugin-2.4-2.fc20' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-15936/qtbrowserplugin-2.4-2.fc20 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
qtbrowserplugin-2.4-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.