Spec URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python-llvmpy.spec SRPM URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python-llvmpy-0.12.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: llvmpy is a Python wrapper around the llvm C++ library which allows simple access to compiler tools. Fedora Account System Username: sergiopr
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 2416640 bytes in 171 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation Rpmlint ------- Checking: python-llvmpy-0.12.0-1.fc20.i686.rpm python-llvmpy-0.12.0-1.fc20.src.rpm python-llvmpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US llvm -> llama 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. --> Ignorable Provides -------- python-llvmpy: python-llvmpy python-llvmpy(x86-32) Unversioned so-files -------------------- python-llvmpy: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/llvmpy/_api.so python-llvmpy: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/llvmpy/_capsule.so --> Ignorable Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -rvn python-llvmpy-0.12.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386 Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG *************************************** APPROVED. Suggestions: 1. %{buildroot}/%{python_sitearch} can be %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch} 2. Source can be Source0 3. Is it possible to use llvmpy as its %{name}? I think upstream won't release 2 version for py2 and py3 in parallel.
Also if you think -doc is needed, please add -doc subpackage.
Also again(sorry), I just checked documentation of llvmpy and found: python -c "import llvm; llvm.test()" is used for simple test, is it possible for you to add it into %check?
Hi, thanks for the review. I have added the test in check. The documentation is small, less than 300k, so for the moment I don't think we need a -doc subpackage. Regarding the name, there was an exception for python packages having a "py" in the name, they could remain with their name. But the exception was removed so now all python packages need to follow python-%{name} rule.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-llvmpy Short Description: Python bindings for LLVM Owners: sergiopr Branches: f18 f19 f20 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).