+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #759163 +++ Description of problem: I have discovered the following incompatibility between gnome-keyring SSH agent and ssh-agent from the OpenSSH package: I have several key pairs in ~/.ssh, but I mostly use only the default one: ~/.ssh/id_rsa. It worked with ssh-agent - I have added this one key using ssh-add, entered the passphrase, and when I wanted to use a different key, I used an explicit -i ~/.ssh/otherkey parameter to ssh. Now gnome-keyring apparently adds _all_ the keys to its internal ssh agent, and when I try to log to a server where I don't have my key in .ssh/authorized_keys, ssh tries to offer all those keys, which results in "too many authentication failures" error and an immediate disconnect. In addition to that, I cannot remove any of the keys from the keyring agent using ssh-add -d. Even after ssh-add -d, the ssh-add -l command lists all my keys. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gnome-keyring-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64 openssh-5.8p2-22.fc16.x86_64 How reproducible: 100 % Steps to Reproduce: 1. create several RSA and DSA SSH keypairs in ~/.ssh (I have two DSA and four RSA pairs) 2. log into the GNOME session 3. run "ssh -vvv someuser@somehost", where none of the above public keys are present in somehost:~someuser/.ssh/authorized_keys Actual results: All public keys are offered for authentication to the remote server, which then disconnects and the following error message is displayed: Received disconnect from 192.168.1.2: 2: Too many authentication failures for someuser Expected results: Only the keys named "id_rsa" and "id_dsa" (if present), and keys explicitly added with ssh-add should be offered for authentication, and then the "password:" prompt should be displayed. Additional info: ssh-add -d should be able to disable/remove keys from the gnome-keyring agent. --- Additional comment from Michel Alexandre Salim on 2012-07-03 12:24:53 EDT --- Cc:ing myself to this -- I have many secret keys in ~/.ssh, and experienced these "too many authentication failures" if the remote server does not accept one of the earlier keys in the list. It was a bit difficult to pinpoint at the beginning, when the problem surfaced when connecting to servers where I don't even have a public key set up yet and I didn't even get to a password prompt! A good solution for supporting multiple keys would be to make gnome-keyring's key selection context-aware, and let the user specify which site belongs to which key for all but the default id_{r,d}sa keys --- Additional comment from Michel Alexandre Salim on 2012-07-03 12:25:41 EDT --- PS also affects F17, but there's no way to indicate that with Bugzilla. --- Additional comment from Fedora End Of Life on 2013-01-16 12:47:13 EST --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '16'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from Fedora End Of Life on 2013-02-13 17:40:37 EST --- Fedora 16 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-02-12. Fedora 16 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 19 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-01-06. Fedora 19 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.